教學內容: |
1.課程說明
影片賞析:
(不願面對的真相2預告片)
(國家地理頻道-全球暖化)
(一分鐘看懂臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2017)
2.環境議題與根本原因之探討
2.1. 環境議題概述
* David Hunter et al., Ch1, The Wild Environment Facts, in INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, Foundation Press, 5th ed. (2015) pp 3-6;pp 21-37.
2.2 環境議題根本原因之探討
# David Hunter et al., Ch2, The Root Causes, in INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, 5th ed. (2015) pp 39-100.
3. 氣候變遷簡介
# David Hunter et al., Ch11, The Law of Climate Change, Foundation Press, 5th ed. (2015) pp 607-664.
* Global Warming of 1.5C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) pp 1-31.
* Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) pp 1-31.
* IPCC Special Report “Global Warming of 1.5°C” Summary for Teachers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) pp 5-23.
* 網路資源:(NASA GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE):https://climate.nasa.gov/
* 葉俊榮,第一章〈氣候變遷的形貌與內涵:科技、治理與法律〉,氣候變遷治理與法律,國立台灣大學出版中心,2015,頁11-27。
4.國際環境議題與氣候變遷的規範化與發展
4.1 全球環境議題的規範化
# 葉俊榮,第三章〈全球環境議題的規範化與時效化〉,全球環境議題:台灣觀點,巨流圖書公司,1999,頁43-58。
# 葉俊榮,第四章〈全球環境議題的發展趨勢與衝擊〉,全球環境議題:台灣觀點,巨流圖書公司,1999,頁59-71。
* 國際環境規範的形成:條約、習慣法與軟法
David Hunter et al., Ch 6, International Environmental Lawmaking, in INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, Foundation Press, 5th ed. (2015) 267-366.
5.氣候變遷的法律框架
5.1 氣候變遷法律框架概述
* 葉俊榮,第二章〈氣候變遷的全球治理〉,氣候變遷治理與法律,國立台灣大學出版中心,2015,頁41-57。
# David Hunter et al., Ch 11, The Law of Climate Change, in INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, Foundation Press, 5th ed. (2015), pp 665-721.
5.2 巴黎協議
* Ralph Bodle; Lena Donat; Matthias Duwe, The Paris Agreement: Analysis, Assessment and Outlook, 2016 CCLR 5 (2016), pp 5-22.
* Paris Agreement (version of 22 October 2018)
* Paris Agreement Rulebook (version of December 15 2018)
5.3 氣候變遷的規範化
* 葉俊榮等(2016),〈氣候法律2.0:聯合國氣候變化綱要公約第二十一次締約方大會與巴黎協議〉,月旦法學雜誌,250期,頁43-61。
* 葉俊榮等(2017),〈啟動氣候法律2.0:聯合國氣候變化綱要公約第二十二次締約方大會紀實與檢討〉,月旦法學雜誌,263期,頁223-246。
* 張文貞等(2018),〈聯合國氣候變化綱要公約第23次締約方大會紀實與檢討〉,月旦法學雜誌,279期,頁202-229。
* COP24相關簡報
6.國際規範效力的爭辯與國際法研究取向
6.1 利益本位理論
# Oona A. Hathaway & Harold Hongju Koh eds., FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS (Foundation Press, 2005), pp 26-110.
6.2 程序論
# Oona A. Hathaway & Harold Hongju Koh eds., FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS (Foundation Press, 2005), pp 173-204.
6.3 建構論
* Oona A. Hathaway & Harold Hongju Koh eds., FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS (Foundation Press, 2005), pp 112-135.
6.4 正義論
* Oona A. Hathaway & Harold Hongju Koh eds., FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS (Foundation Press, 2005), pp 135-173.
6.5 氣候變遷與全球行政法
* 林春元,第四章〈全球行政法的出現〉,〈氣候變遷全球行政法的演變、形貌與影響〉,國立臺灣大學出版中心,2017,頁121-160。
* 林春元,第八章〈氣候變遷全球行政法的形成〉,〈氣候變遷全球行政法的演變、形貌與影響〉,國立臺灣大學出版中心,2017,頁325-366。
* 葉俊榮,第十二章〈氣候變遷下的法律原則與規範變遷〉,氣候變遷治理與法律,國立台灣大學出版中心,2015,頁442-449。
7.氣候變遷訴訟與所面臨的困境
7.1 氣候變遷訴訟概述
7.2.1 因果關係認定不易
7.2.2 風險不確定性
7.2.3 當事人適格
7.2.4 政治問題不受理
7.2.5 資訊取得
# Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
* Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)
* Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 696 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2012)
* Jacqueline Peel and Hari M. Osofsky, Ch1, Why climate change litigation matters, in CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION, 1st ed(2015), pp 1-27.
* Jacqueline Peel and Hari M. Osofsky, Ch2, Model for understanding litigation’s regulatory impact, in CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION, 1st ed(2015), pp 28-53.
* 葉俊榮,第十一章〈氣候變遷的司法實踐〉,氣候變遷治理與法律,國立台灣大學出版中心,2015,頁385-416。
* 林春元(2015),〈環境影響評估納入氣候變遷的司法途徑--美國法的發展與啟示〉,中原財經法學,頁196-198。
* 黃丞儀(2015),〈潔淨空氣,如何解釋?從 Duke Energy (2007) 與 Massachusetts v.EPA (2007)論美國行政法中立法目的、行政解釋和司法審查之關係〉,臺大法學論叢,44卷3期,頁696-704。
* 台大環續中心簡介Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007):(http://www.law.ntu.edu.tw/ntulawples/bbs/board.php?bo_table=eplr&wr_id=79&sca=52)
8.氣候變遷訴訟鳥瞰
Case 1 :Lliuya v. RWE AG (2015)
* Myanna Dellinger, See You in Court: Around the World in Eight Climate Change Lawsuits, 42 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L.& Pol'y Rev. 525, pp 528-532(2018).
Case 2:Aji P. v. State of Washington (2018)
* 網路資料(https://static1.squarespace.com/static/571d109b04426270152febe0/t/5b7369fa89858325de8c85c7/1534290427139/2018.08.14+Ruling+on+Motion+to+Dismiss+Aji+P+v.+Washington+.pdf)
8 Case 3:Juliana v. United States (2016)
9 Case 4:Future Generations v. Ministry of the Environment and Others (2018)
* Jorge Iván Palacio & Juan C. Herrera, First Rivers, then Mountains, and Now the Amazon. Do “Things” Have Rights?, International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, September 18, 2018,
(http://www.iconnectblog.com/2018/09/first-rivers-then-mountains-and-now-the-amazon-do-things-have-rights/?fbclid=IwAR2YuBals52wBn0F7oj24NIToUBLKr2yTFvp07OPiY2zwhNa0DhfzijZwSo)
10 Case 5:Urgenda Foundation v. Kingdom of the Netherlands (2018)
* Myanna Dellinger, See You in Court: Around the World in Eight Climate Change Lawsuits, 42 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L.& Pol'y Rev. 525, pp 533-537(2018).
11 Case 6: Plan B Earth and Others v. The Secretary of State for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (2018)
12 Case 7:Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. U.S. Department of State (2017)
13 課程總結:
9.司法可能採取路徑的觀察
* 張文貞(2018),〈法律於台灣能源轉型的角色---公民投票與司法途徑〉(簡報檔)
* Clarke, Hussin, Langan, Rosin, Climate change litigation:A new class of action, White& Case International Law Firm, Global Law Practice (https://www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/thought-leadership-climate-change-litigation-18-single-web.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2kYlga8Tu-O9Or9jDOWAPx2AyQ9RkDvS44KTmBmVafwrx8w7YeNJgbA6U)
# 葉俊榮,第四章〈氣候變遷的責任承擔〉,氣候變遷治理與法律,國立台灣大學出版中心,2015,頁133-163。
期末報告繳交
|